
|
Steller sea lion
biology > Population decline
Decline of Steller Sea Lion Population
Since 1980, the world population of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias
jubatus) has dropped from around 300,000 animals to fewer than 100,000,
and it is still declining. In 1997, the portion of the population
breeding from Prince William Sound through the Aleutian Islands was
declared an endangered species under the United States Endangered
Species Act. No one knows exactly why the population is dwindling,
but researchers at the North Pacific Universities Marine Mammal Research
Consortium are trying to solve this mysterious puzzle.
Reasons for Population Decline
Noticeable reductions or depletions have occurred in the abundance
of Steller sea lion, harbour seal, northern fur seal and some sea
bird populations in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. Possible causes
include increased incidence of parasites and disease, predation by
killer whales, nutritional stress through competition with man or
other species for food, or nutritional stress caused by natural and/
or human-induced changes in the abundance, quality and distribution
of prey. Other factors that may be contributing to the population
decline include meteorological changes (i.e., frequency of storms),
pollution and toxic substances, entanglement in marine debris, and
incidental and intentional take by man.
For the most part, data to assess each of the possibilities
are currently limited. Whether the decline is caused by a single factor
or a combination of all of the above is a matter of scientific debate.
Research by the Consortium, however, is focusing on the nutritional
stress hypothesis as a major contributor to the population decline.
NEXT: Steller sea lion anatomy >>>

|
|
Ecosystem models of the Aleutian Islands and Southeast Alaska show that Steller sea lions are impacted by killer whale predation when sea lion numbers are low.
|
|
Guénette, S., S.J.J. Heymans, V. Christensen, A.W. Trites. 2007.
|
|
In J.F. Piatt and S.M. Gende (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth Glacier Bay Science Symposium, U.S. Geological Survey, Juneau , Alaska. pp. 150-154.
|
|
abstract
We constructed ecosystem models using the Ecopath with Ecosim software to evaluate whether predation by killer whales might explain the decline of Steller sea lions since the late 1970s in the western Aleutian Islands. We also sought to understand why sea lions increased in the presence of killer whales in Southeast Alaska. Modeling results reproduced the time series of abundances for exploited species and sea lions in both ecosystems. Simulation results suggest that killer whale predation contributed to the decline of sea lions in the western Aleutians, but that predation was not the primary cause of the population decline. Predation could however have become a significant source of mortality during the 1990s when sea lions numbers were much lower. In Southeast Alaska, predation was also found to be a significant source of mortality in the 1960s when sea lions were low, but ceased to control population growth through the 1980s and 1990s. Overall, the ecosystem models suggest that large populations of Steller sea lions can withstand predation, but that small populations are vulnerable to killer whales.
|
|
|
|
|
Killer whales, whaling and sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific: a comparative analysis of the dynamics of marine mammals in Alaska and British Columbia following commercial whaling.
|
|
Trites, A. W., V. B. Deecke, E. J. Gregr, J. K. B. Ford, and P. F. Olesiuk. 2007.
|
|
Marine Mammal Science 23:751-765.
|
|
abstract
The hypothesis that commercial whaling caused a sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean by forcing killer whales to eat progressively smaller species of marine mammals is not supported by what is known about the biology of large whales, the ecology of killer whales and the patterns of ecosystem change that took place in Alaska, British Columbia, and elsewhere in the world following whaling. A comparative analysis shows that populations of seals, sea lions and sea otters increased in British Columbia following commercial whaling, unlike the declines noted in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands. The declines of seals and sea lions that began in western Alaska around 1977 were mirrored by increases in numbers of these species in British Columbia. A more likely explanation is the seal and sea lion declines and other ecosystem changes in Alaska stems from a major oceanic regime shift that occurred in 1977. Killer whales are unquestionably a significant predator of seals, sea lions and sea otters but not because of commercial whaling.
|
|
|
|
|
The Sequential Megafaunal Collapse Hypothesis: Testing with Existing Data.
|
|
DeMaster, D.P., A.W. Trites, P. Clapham, S. Mizroch, P. Wade, R.J. Small, and J. Ver Hoef. 2006.
|
|
Progress in Oceanography 68:329-342.
|
|
abstract
Springer et al. [Springer, A.M., Estes, J.A., van Vliet, G.B., Williams, T.M., Doak, D.F., Danner, E.M., Forney, K.A., Pfister, B., 2003. Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: an ongoing legacy of industrial whaling? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (21), 12,223–12,228] hypothesized that great whales were an important prey resource for killer whales, and that the removal of fin and sperm whales by commercial whaling in the region of the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands (BSAI) in the late 1960s and 1970s led to cascading trophic interactions that caused the sequential decline of populations of harbor seal, northern fur seal, Steller sea lion and northern sea otter. This hypothesis, referred to as the Sequential Megafaunal Collapse (SMC), has stirred considerable interest because of its implication for ecosystem-based management. The SMC has the following assumptions: (1) fin whales and sperm whales were important as prey species in the Bering Sea; (2) the biomass of all large whale species (i.e., North Pacific right, fin, humpback, gray, sperm, minke and bowhead whales) was in decline in the Bering Sea in the 1960s and early 1970s; and (3) pinniped declines in the 1970s and 1980s were sequential. We concluded that the available data are not consistent with the first two assumptions of the SMC. Statistical tests of the timing of the declines do not support the assumption that pinniped declines were sequential. We propose two alternative hypotheses for the declines that are more consistent with the available data. While it is plausible, from energetic arguments, for predation by killer whales to have been an important factor in the declines of one or more of the three populations of pinnipeds and the sea otter population in the BSAI region over the last 30 years, we hypothesize that the declines in pinniped populations in the BSAI can best be understood by invoking a multiple factor hypothesis that includes both bottom–up forcing (as indicated by evidence of nutritional stress in the western Steller sea lion population) and top–down forcing (e.g., predation by killer whales, mortality incidental to commercial fishing, directed harvests). Our second hypothesis is a modification of the top–down forcing mechanism (i.e., killer whale predation on one or more of the pinniped populations and the sea otter population is mediated via the recovery of the eastern North Pacific population of the gray whale). We remain skeptical about the proposed link between commercial whaling on fin and sperm whales, which ended in the mid-1960s, and the observed decline of populations of northern fur seal, harbor seal, and Steller sea lion some 15 years later.
|
|
|
|
|
Modeling spatial dynamics of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods: evaluating causes for population decline.
|
|
Fay, G. and A.E. Punt. 2006.
|
|
In A.W. Trites, S. Atkinson, D.P. DeMaster, L.W. Fritz, T.S. Gelatt, L.D. Rea and K. Wynne (eds), Sea Lions of the World. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. pp. 405-433.
|
|
abstract
The timing and extent of the negative population trend in the abundance of the western stock of Steller sea lions has not been geographically uniform. A stochastic metapopulation dynamics model is developed for Steller sea lions. This model allows for geographical differences in factors affecting population processes, and can be parameterized to represent a wide range of hypotheses for the decline in Steller sea lion abundance. Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods are used to fit this model to pup and non-pup count data, age structure samples, and survival estimates. Inferences from model selection criteria highlight the spatial variability in the types of impact deemed to provide most parsimonious representation of the data. Bayesian posteriors for the estimated model parameters show that many combinations of parameter values are able to provide similar fits to the data, even given a specific hypothesis for the decline. This highlights the uncertainty in the precise nature of the impact of these hypotheses. Indeed, while pup production is generally estimated consistently among models, estimates of the size of other components of the Steller sea lion population (such as total population size) depend greatly on the assumptions regarding the cause of the decline. The results demonstrate that future simulation modeling approaches will require more formal, spatial, and mechanistic descriptions of the manner in which specific hypotheses for the decline affect the population.
|
|
|
|
|
Ecosystem models show combined effects of fishing, predation, competition, and ocean productivity on Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska.
|
|
Guénette, S., S.J.J. Heymans, V. Christensen, and A.W. Trites. 2006.
|
|
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:2495-2517.
|
|
abstract
Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) increased in the eastern portion of their range while declining in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands from the late 1970s to late 1990s. We constructed ecosystem models of the central and western Aleutians and of Southeast Alaska to simultaneously evaluate four hypotheses explaining sea lion dynamics: killer whale (Orcinus orca) predation, ocean productivity, fisheries, and competition with other species. Comparisons of model predictions to historical time series data indicate that all four factors likely contributed to the trends observed in sea lion numbers in both ecosystems. Changes in ocean productivity conveyed by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation influenced the abundance trajectory of several species. Fishing could have affected the ecosystem structure by influencing the abundance of Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius) in the Aleutians, and herring (Clupea pallasii) in Southeast Alaska. Halibut (Hypoglossus stenolepis) in the Aleutians and arrowtooth flounder (Reinhardtius stomias) in Southeast Alaska appear to impede sea lion population growth through competitive interactions. Predation by killer whales was important when sea lions were less abundant in the 1990s in the Aleutians and in the 1960s in Southeast Alaska, but appear to have little effect when sea lion numbers were high.
|
|
|
|
|
Can experimental manipulation be used to determine the cause of the decline of western stock of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus)?
|
|
Punt, A.E. and G. Fay. 2006.
|
|
In A.W. Trites, S. Atkinson, D.P. DeMaster, L.W. Fritz, T.S.ReaL.D. Gelatt and K. Wynne (eds), Sea Lions of the World. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. pp. 435-454.
|
|
abstract
A variety of reasons have been postulated for the decline of Steller sea
lions (Otariidae: Eumetopias jubatus) in the Northeast Pacific. To date, however, it
has proved impossible to distinguish among these reasons given the available data.
In principle, experimental management based on spatial replication of treatments
could be used to discriminate among some of these hypotheses. A simulation protocol
was developed and applied to evaluate the power of a set of potential experiments to
distinguish between whether the cause of the decline was fishing-induced or due to
other factors. The simulations are based on an operating model that is
individual-based and spatially explicit, and can be parameterized to represent the
implications of a range of possible causes for the decline. This model can be used
to generate the types of data typically available for the western stock of Steller
sea lions. Experiments based on splitting four of the regions identified for past
ana!
lyses of population dynamics information into sectors that are either open to some
fishing or completely closed are considered. The performance of these experiments
is, however, poor, owing to the impact of movement, different historical trends in
different areas, demographic stochasticity, and the likely size of the effect that
the experiments are attempting to detect. These results suggest that the currently
available information imply that large-scale experimental manipulation by means of
additional spatial closures, where the results are analyzed by examining trends in
pup counts, is unlikely to provide an effective means of discriminating among
alternative hypotheses for the declining Steller sea lions in Alaska.
|
|
|
|
|
Risk of extirpation of Steller sea lions in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands: a population viability analysis based on alternative hypotheses for why sea lions declined in western Alaska.
|
|
Winship, A.J., and A.W. Trites. 2006.
|
|
Marine Mammal Science 22(1):124-155.
|
|
abstract
We estimated the risk that the Steller sea lion will be extirpated in western
Alaska using a population viability analysis (PVA) that combined simulations with
statistically fitted models of historical population dynamics. Our analysis considered
the roles that density-dependent and density-independent factors may have played
in the past, and how they might influence future population dynamics. It also
established functional relationships between population size, population growth
rate and the risk of extinction under alternative hypotheses about population
regulation and environmental variability. These functional relationships can be
used to develop recovery criteria and guide research and management decisions.
Life table parameters (e.g., birth and survival rates) operating during the population
decline (1978?2002) were estimated by fitting simple age-structured models to
time-series of pup and non-pup counts from 33 rookeries (subpopulations). The
PVA was carried out by projecting all 33 subpopulations into the future using
these estimated site-specific life tables (with associated uncertainties) and
different assumptions about carrying capacities and the presence or absence of
density-dependent population regulation. Results suggest that the overall predicted
risk of extirpation of Stelsler sea lions as a species in western Alaska was low
in the next 100 yr under all scenarios explored. However, most subpopulations
of Steller sea lions had high probabilities of going extinct within the next 100
yr if trends observed during the 1990s were to continue. Two clusters of contiguous
subpopulations occurring in the Unimak Pass area in the western Gulf of Alaska/eastern
Aleutian Islands and the Seguam?Adak region in the central Aleutian Islands had
relatively lower risks of extinction. Risks of extinction for a number of subpopulations
in the Gulf of Alaska were reduced if the increases observed since the late 1990s
continue into the fu ture. The risks of subpopulations going extinct were small
whe n densit ydependent compensation in birth and survival rates were assumed,
even when random stochasticity in these vital rates was introduced.
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of prey availability on pup mortality and the timing of birth of South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) in Peru.
|
|
Soto, K., A.W. Trites, and M. Arias-Schreiber. 2004.
|
|
Journal of Zoology 264:419-428.
|
|
abstract
Pup mortality and the timing of birth of South American sea lions Otaria flavescens were investigated to determine the possible relationship between fluctuations in prey availability in the Peruvian upwelling ecosystem and current and future reproductive success of sea lions during six consecutive breeding seasons. Our study from 1997 to 2002 encompassed the strongest El Nino on record and one La Nina event. Pup mortality ranged from 13% before El Nino to 100% during El Nino, and was negatively correlated with prey availability. Abortions were also more frequent when prey availability was low. However, pup mortality remained high following El Ni~no due to the punctuated short-term effects it had on population dynamics and subsequent maternal behaviour. Births occurred later in the season after years of low food availability and earlier following years of high food availability. The peak of pupping coincided with the peak of mortality in all years, and may have !
been the product of intensive competition between bulls at the peak of the breeding season. The stronger and more frequent El Ninos that appear to be occurring along the Peruvian coast may produce significant stochastic changes in future births and pup mortality, which may place the vulnerable South American sea lion population in Peru at greater risk.
|
|
|
|
|
Whales, whaling and ecosystem change in the Antarctic and Eastern Bering Sea: insights from ecosystem models.
|
|
Trites, A. W.,Bredesen, E.L. and Coombs,A.P. 2004.
|
|
In Investigating the roles of cetaceans in marine ecosystems. Monaco: CIESM Workshop Monographs pp. 85-92.
|
|
abstract
Ecosystem models were constructed for the Antarctic and the Bering Sea that incorporate current understanding of biological interactions of species within the ecosystem (i.e., who eats whom and how much). Within the limitations that are inherent to simulations, both models suggest that removal of large whales had little measurable effect on lower trophic levels or on the dynamics of other species in their polar ecosystems.
Trophic interactions failed to explain the magnitude of changes in the biomass of the major species groups in the Antarctic and Bering Sea. Nor did fin-fisheries appear to have had a significant effect on the abundance of non-targeted species. This may mean that environmental effects (which were not modeled) play an important role in influencing the dynamics of marine ecosystems. Oceanographic factors such as changes in water temperature or ocean currents likely result in variations in ecosystem production and species recruitment patterns which are not captured by our Ecopath models.
The Ecopath modeling approach is a powerful means of synthesizing knowledge about ecosystems and the factors that influence ecosystem dynamics. They provide a straightforward means for estimating trophic levels and niche overlaps with other species to assess the potential for resource competition. While the models failed to support the hypotheses that large whales play a significant structural role in the Antarctic and Bering Sea ecosystems, they do support what most already know ?- i.e., that populations of large whales are easily reduced to low numbers, but take a long, long time to recover. They also help in recognizing the need to consider factors other than food web interactions when assessing the status of cetaceans, as well as highlighting the potential tradeoffs that can result when other species are removed from ecosystems.
|
|
|
|
|
Implications of three viability models for the conservation status of the western population of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus).
|
|
Gerber, L.R. and G.R. VanBlaricom. 2001.
|
|
Biological Conservation 102:261-269.
|
|
abstract
Two distinct viability models are developed for Steller sea lions (Eumetopias
jubatus )to evaluate the sensitivity of extinction risk
to various levels of stochasticity,spatial scale and density dependence.These
models include a metapopulation model,Analysis of
the Likelihood of Extinction (ALEX;Possingham et al.,1992; Possingham,H., Davies,I.A.,Noble,I.1992.ALEX
2.2 Operation
Manual.Department of Applied Mathematics,University of Adelaide,Adelaide,SA 5005;Australia.),and
a model that incorpo-
rates both sampling and process error in estimating population parameters from
timeseries data (Gerber and DeMaster,1999;
Gerber,L.R.,DeMaster,D.P.1999.An approach to endangered species act classification
of long-lived vertebrates:a case study of
north Pacific humpback whales.Conservation Biology 13 (5);1203 –1214.).Results
are compared with a third model that encompasses three different geographic scales
(York et al.,1996;York,A.E.,Merrick,R.L.,Loughlin,T.R.1996.An analysis of the
Steller Sea lion metapopulation in Alaska.In:McCullough,D.R.(Ed.),Metapopulations
and Wildlife Conservation.Island Press,
Covelo,CA pp.259 –292).The combination of modeling approaches provides
a basis for considering how model parameterization
and the selection of classification criteria affect both model results and potential
status determinations.Results from the models
generally agree with regard to central tendency,25th and 75th percentile times
to extinction.For Steller sea lions,the distributions
of time to extinction for each model were narrower than the range of extinction
distributions between models.If this finding applies
generally to listed species,it would suggest that more than one viability model
should be considered when listing decisions are
made.On a more applied basis,the results of our analysis provide a quantitative
assessment of extinction risk of Steller sea lions in
the context of its status pursuant to the US Endangered Species Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Ecosystem change and the decline of marine mammals in the Eastern Bering Sea: testing the ecosystem shift and commercial whaling hypotheses.
|
|
Trites, A.W., P.A. Livingston, M.C. Vasconcellos, S. Mackinson, A.M. Springer and D. Pauly. 1999.
|
|
Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. pp. 106
|
|
abstract
Over the past 10 years there has been increasing criticism of management
decisions that are based on single species approaches and a call for the
implementation of ecosystem approaches. The major criticism of single species
models is that they cannot predict changes in community struc ture.
Unfortunately, our experience in modeling the Bering Sea shows that
these same criticisms can also be leveled against ecosystem models.
We employed trophic mass balance models (Ecopath and Ecosim) to
examine some possible explanations for the changes that occurred in the
Bering Sea between the 1950s and 1980s. We removed fish and mammals
from the modeled system and tracked how other components of the eco system
responded. Our mass balance models indicate that neither whal ing
nor commercial fisheries were sufficient to explain the 400% increase
in pollock biomass and other changes that may have occurred between
the two time periods. The simulations further suggest that environmental
factors, affecting recruitment or primary production, may be more impor tant
in determining the dynamics of the Bering Sea ecosystem than preda tor
prey interactions alone. These findings illustrate that mass balance
models that do not account for the impact of climate variability on year class
strength cannot provide reliable estimates of trends in marine fish
production. However, our models can show how predation and fishing
can affect trophic interactions among species. As such, ecosystem models
are a useful scientific tool to identify gaps in understanding and data
needs, but are unlikely to ever replace single species models. They may
instead complement and provide parameters to single species models.
Ecosystem models such as ours are still in the early stages of develop ment
and will become increasingly more important as a management tool
as they begin to incorporate spatial and oceanographic/climatic information.
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the abundance of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska from 1956 to 1992: how many were there?
|
|
Trites, Andrew W. and Peter A. Larkin. 1996.
|
|
Aquatic Mammals 22:153-166.
|
|
abstract
The size of Steller sea lion populations in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands was estimated by applying life table statistics to counts of pups and adults (non-pups) at rookery sites. Total population size was 5.10 times the number of pups counted or 3.43 times the number of adults counted. Only 55% of the adult population return to rookeries during the summer. Data compiled from published and unpublished sources for all 39 major rookeries in Alaska suggest that the total number of Steller sea lions (including pups) rose from 250 000 to 282 000 between the mid 1950s and the mid 1970s. Since 1980 it has decreased by over 70% (roughly 5% per year) to about 76 000 animals in 1992. Most of the decline appears to have slowed or stopped within two subareas of these large regions- the eastern Aleutians and western Gulf of Alaska. Increases have been occurring in the smaller populations of southeast Alaska. It is not known why these changes have occurred.
keywords abundance, Steller sea lions, Alaska, decline, #2
|
|
|
|
|
Final report on an investigation of image processing techniques for the problem of automatic counting of sea lions from aerial video.
|
|
Gosine, R.G. and L. Gamage. 1994.
|
|
University of British Columbia, Industrial Automation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2324 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4.
|
|
abstract
A coalition of North Pacific fishing industry groups has been working to address
pending restrictions on the Gulf of Alaska and Eastern Bering Sea commercial fishery as
a result of possible decline of the Steller sea lion population. A component of the resea.rch
into this problem is the investigataioonf techniques to automate the counting of sea lions
from aerial video of the Alaska coast. Currently, sea-lion counts are completed mmually
from 35mm slides, and there is some concern regarding t,he accuracy and repeatabilityof
such an approach.
It is proposed that computer-assisted counting from video tape or digitised slides (CDROM)
could provide a better alternative to manual counting in terms of improved spatial
coverage, improved reliability/consistency and reduced labour costs.
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical considerations in assessing recent adult/juvenile census trends of Steller sea lions.
|
|
Schaffner, A.A., S.B. Mathews and J.E. Zeh. 1994.
|
|
Report to the North Pacific Universities Marine Mammal Research Consortium, University of Washington, Fisheries Research Institute, WH-10, Seattle WA.
|
|
abstract
From June 1985 through June 1992 regular aerial surveys over Southeast Alaska,
the Gulf of Alaska, and Aleutian Islands were conducted to monitor the distribution
and abundance of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Furthermore, during 1992
the use of repetitive aerial surveys was introduced to study survey variability. The
purposes of our present study were two-fold: (1) To investigate alternative statistical
procedures for estimating population trend rates from aerial survey counts, and (2)
to apply these procedures to the 1989-92 counts. We focused on 1989-92 because of
the more abundant data for that period and to determine the most recent direction of
population abundance relative to the well-documented steep decline prior to 1989. We
concluded that parametric bootstrapping was the most appropriate interval estimation
procedure. For this procedure the 90% confidence interval for the rate of change between
the 1989 and 1992 Kenai-Kiska Recovery Plan trend site counts was (-10.19%, 2.62%).
For glJ rookery and haul-out sites within the Kenai-Kiska region for which counts were
made for both 1989 and 1992, the 90% confidence interval was (-6.20%, 6.81%). For
sites outside the Kenai-Kiska region, the 90% confidence interval for the rate of change
between 1989 and 1992 was (-37.92%, -6.93%). The parametric bootstrap procedure
had the weakness of including data from only pairs of years; thus, 1990-91 information
was excluded from the above interval estimates. Consequently, we investigated the
use of both generalized linear modeling (GLM) and generalized estimating equations
(GEE) as tools for analyzing all four years' data together. GLM seemed less appropriate
than GEE, and the latter procedure yielded conclusions similar to those of parametric
bootstrapping: 1989-92 stability for sea lion abundance in the Kenai-Kiska region, and
some likelihood of decline from 1989-1992 considering all sites together.
|
|
|
|
|
The status of Steller sea lion populations and the development of fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands.
|
|
Trites, A.W. and P.A. Larkin. 1992.
|
|
In A report of the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric award no. NA17FD0177. University of British Columbia, Fisheries Centre, 2204 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4. pp. 134
|
|
abstract
The goal of our study was to assess the status of Steller sea lions in Alaska, review their
population biology, and develop a simulation model to explore the role that harvesting and
incidental kills by fisheries may have played in the sea lion decline. We also attempted to relate
the population declines to the amount of fish caught in the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands,
and to the number of vessels fishing from 1950 to 1990.
Using life tables to estimate population size, the numbers of Steller sea lions were estimated
for all rookeries for which information was available in each of six areas in the Gulf of Alaska
and Aleutian Islands. The total population appears to have risen from 150,000 to 210,000 from
the mid 1950s to 1967. The population was then stable for roughly ten years, then increased to
225,000 by 1979. Since then it has decreased to about 85,000. Most of the decline took place
in Area 3 (Kodiak region) but there were also significant declines in Areas 4 to 6 (westward of
Kodiak). Increases have occurred in the smaller populations of Areas 1 and 2 (southeast Alaska
and Prince William Sound).
A major growth in domestic fisheries occurred after the declaration of 200 mile zones. The
traditional fisheries for salmon, herring and halibut were augmented by major groundfish
fisheries. The decline in the numbers of Steller sea lions has been coincidental with the growth
in the numbers and size of vessels and the increase in catch.
The stabilization in the numbers of Steller sea lions in the Gulf of Alaska from 1956 to 1980
can be attributed to the direct effect of incidental capture in fishing gear, the shooting of sea lions
and the harvesting of adults and pups. However, these factors explain but a small portion of the
recent population decline, from 1980 to the present. Some sea lions are missing in the arithmetic
of population dynamics which cannot be accounted for by movements of animals from one area
to another. Whether these losses are caused by the removal of food resources is a circumstantial
possibility, but evidence of local abundance of food resources at particular times of the year for
particular segments of the population is needed to build a convincing case. Other causes, such
as diseases and parasites must also be kept in mind as possible contributing factors.
Research on Steller sea lions should focus on the decline in abundance since 1980, changes
in body size, the diet at various seasons of the year, bioenergetics and nutritional requirements,
and assessment of local abundance of various food items. Long term research on the ecosystem
dynamics of the region will be necessary for long term management of all living resources but
how best to focus that research is a matter of current scientific debate that will not be resolved
quickly.
|
|
|
|
|