|
|
Turning Point: Analyzing the Physics of Foraging
In
the undersea world of eat-or-be-eaten, speed and agility can make all
the difference between finding a meal and becoming one. The Steller
sea lion’s
finely tuned body, while cumbersome on land, lends a competitive edge
when hunting fish and eluding larger predators such as killer whales.
But swimming consumes energy, and out-maneuvering predators and prey
is especially taxing. Under normal conditions, a hearty meal will offset
the energetic cost of foraging. But conditions are far from normal in
Western Alaska, where a shift in ocean climate has impacted fish stocks
and caused widespread nutritional stress among sea lions. Under these
circumstances, the energetic cost of maneuvering may have a significant
effect on how starving sea lions interact with their predators and prey.
Maneuverability — and hence the energetic cost of maneuvering — are
not well-researched aspects of sea lion locomotion. To address this knowledge
gap, a team of researchers from the University of British Columbia set
out to describe the turning dynamics – the forces generated
during turning – of three captive sea lions at the Vancouver Aquarium.
The study, authored by Olivier Cheneval, Robert W. Blake, Andrew W. Trites,
and K.H.S. Chan, was recently published in the journal Marine Mammal
Science.
Taking Turns The scientists filmed the sea lions performing
180° turns, and analyzed
the principle components of the forces generated by body and flipper
movements during each turn. The sea lions decelerated during the first
half of a turn, reached their slowest speed in the middle of the turn,
and then accelerated out of the turn with a powerful stroke of the pectoral
flippers.
Looking more closely, the scientists were able to
determine how much thrust and centripetal (rotational) force were generated
during acceleration. They found that the most thrust (5 m/s2) was generated
halfway through the power phase, or the down-stroke of the pectoral
flipper in the second half of the turn. Centripetal force peaked at the
beginning of the power stroke, when the body arches through the sharpest
point of the turn. Maximum turning velocity was 3.5 meters per second,
while turning radius was 0.3 body lengths and turning duration was 1.6
seconds

Four simultaneous underwater photographs showing a Steller sea lion entering
a turn.
Cameras were placed on the east, west, north and south walls
of the Research Pool
Of particular interest was the minimum turning radius, or the
tightness of the turn measured in body lengths, compared to that of fish
and marine mammals such as cetaceans (e.g., killer whales) and other
otariids (e.g., California sea lions).
The authors noted that California and Steller sea lions have similar
body plans featuring highly mobile flippers and very flexible bodies,
which afford them an impressive array of maneuvering capabilities within
the same stereotypic turning pattern. However, despite similar body plans
and comparable turning radii, the study found that California sea lions
turn more slowly than their Steller cousins.
When compared to small schooling fish, the preferred
prey of Steller sea lions, the fish were found to have a significantly
lower (i.e., sharper) turning radius and a higher rate of turn than
sea lions. Theoretically, this might allow them to consistently outswim
a pursuing sea lion. However, as the authors point out, a sea lion’s higher absolute speed and
its use of hunting techniques such as concentrating, disturbing, and
disorienting the fish could even the field by reducing the fishes’ relative
maneuverability.
When
compared to cetaceans such as killer whales, sea lions were found to
have superior turning capabilities, although both cetaceans and
otariids were less maneuverable than fish. Fish
have an arguable advantage in lateral turns due to a laterally compressed
body and a natural side-to-side flexure of the spine. Nevertheless,
the authors conclude, the Steller sea lion’s ability to execute
hairpin turns at high speed places them among the most maneuverable
of the marine mammals.
Having deconstructed the turning dynamics of Steller sea lion locomotion,
the study provides a firm foundation for future research. Future studies
will help to assess how much energy is needed to generate the forces
required for out-maneuvering predators and prey in a complex ocean environment
such as Western Alaska.
15 February 2007
Publication:
|
|
Turning maneuvers in Steller sea lions (Eumatopias jubatus).
|
|
Cheneval, O., R. W. Blake, A. W. Trites and K. H. S. Chan. 2007.
|
|
Marine Mammal Science 23:94-109.
|
|
abstract
Steller sea lions are highly maneuverable marine mammals (expressed as minimum turning radius). Video recordings of turns (n=195) are analyzed from kinematic measurements for three captive animals. Speed-time plots of 180° turns have a typical ?V-shape?. The sea lions decelerated during the first half of the turn, reached a minimum speed in the middle of the curved trajectory and re-accelerated by adduction of the pectoral flippers. The initial deceleration was greater than that for passive gliding due to pectoral flipper braking and/or change in body contour from a stiff, straight streamlined form. Centripetal force and thrust were determined from the body acceleration. Most thrust was produced during the power phase of the pectoral flipper stroke cycle. Contrary to previous findings on otariids, little or no thrust was generated during initial abduction of the pectoral flippers and during the final drag-based paddling phase of the stroke cycle. Peak thrust force!
at the center of gravity occurs halfway through the power phase while the centripetal force is maximal at the beginning of the power stroke. Performance is modulated by changes in the duration and intensity of movements without changing their sequence. Turning radius, maximum velocity, maximum acceleration and turning duration were 0.3 body lengths, 3.5 m/s, 5 m/s2 and 1.6 s respectively. The relative maneuverability based on velocity and length specific minimum turning radius is comparable to other otariids, superior to cetaceans but inferior to many fish.
|
|
|
|
|
|