|
|
Satiation
and Compensation in Young Steller Sea Lions
The nutritional stress hypothesis
suggests that young Steller sea lions may not be consuming sufficient
prey to satisfy their nutritional needs. This might be because the quality
or availability of prey is too low for sea lions to physically consume
enough fish.
The theoretical
amount of fish a sea lion needs to eat can be calculated mathematically.
Bioenergetic models can estimate the amounts needed to sustain growth
and reproduction based on prey type and availability. However, it is not
known whether sea lions can actually physically consume the amounts predicted
by the models.
In a recently published study, five captive yearling Steller sea lions
participated in experiments designed to determine factors that influence
the amount of fish that young sea lions eat. The goal was to understand
how changes in availability and type of fish affected their total food
intake.
The study found that sea
lions adjusted the amounts of food they consumed when offered either high-energy
herring or low-energy capelin. In both cases, however, the sea lions maintained
similar energy intake (See adjoining Figure and compare the bars and dashed
lines for daily herring and capelin consumption).
The sea lions also increased their intake when
herring was only available every other day. However, the increase was
not enough to match the amount of energy they were able to consume when
it was available every day.
When low-energy capelin was offered every other day, the sea lions consumed
slightly more compared to when they ate capelin everyday. But they were
far from meeting their daily needs. In this case, the young sea lions
appeared to reach an upper limit on how much fish they could consume and
process.
The results suggest that younger Steller sea lions may have physical difficulty
consuming sufficient quantities of lower energy prey, particularly when
prey is not consumed on a daily basis. This limitation may be an important
clue for understanding how changes in fish availability and species composition
might have contributed to the decline of Steller sea lions in the North
Pacific.
18 October 2004
Publication
|
Satiation and compensation for short-term changes in food quality and availability in young Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus).
|
|
Rosen, D.A.S. and Trites, A.W. 2004.
|
|
Canadian Journal of Zoology pp. 1061-1069.
|
|
abstract
Foraging theory predicts that animals should proportionately increase their food intake to compensate for reduced energy content and/or prey availability. However, the theoretical intake levels will – at some point – exceed the digestive capacity of the predator. We tested the ability of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus, Schreber, 1776) to compensate for short-term changes in prey energy density and availability, and quantified the maximum amount of food a young sea lion could consume. Five 1-2 year old captive Steller sea lions were alternately offered herring (high-energy) or capelin (low-energy) each day or every second day. When prey were available on a daily basis the sea lions compensated for differences in the energy content of herring and capelin by consuming sufficient quantities of each (8.3 vs. 14.0 kg d-1, respectively) to maintain an equivalent gross energy intake. When herring was available only on alternate days, the sea lions increased their consumption by 52% to 11.5 kg d-1, which was not sufficient to maintain an average gross intake equal to when herring was available every day. When capelin was available only on alternate days, some animals increased their intake for a few days, but average intake (15.2 kg d-1) was far below levels observed during daily feeding. Generally, the sea lions appeared to reach their digestive limit at a level equivalent to 14-16% of their body mass. Our findings suggest that Steller sea lions can alter their food intake in response to short-term changes in prey quality or availability, but that these variables can quickly combine to necessitate food intake levels that exceed the physiological digestive capacities of young animals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|