How big is big?
Size of Steller Sea Lion Prey in Alaska

A perplexing question concerning the decline of Steller sea lions in Alaska is whether fisheries target the same size fish as sea lions eat. This information is needed to assess whether fisheries and sea lions might be competing for food.

The ideal way of measuring a fish is with a ruler. However, only specific parts of the fish, such as the ear bones (otoliths) or jaw bones, are ever recovered from fecal remains (scats). Fortunately, the length of a fish is proportional to the length of many of its bones. The length of a fish can thus be determined by measuring the length of these recovered bones.

There is, however, one more complication to this relatively simple procedure ¿ most of the bones that pass through the digestive system are eroded to various degrees, altering their original size and form. In order to determine how big the digested bones were prior to being swallowed by the sea lion, we must first assess the amount of digestion that has taken place, and apply correction factors accordingly.

This new method for reconstructing the size of fish eaten by Steller sea lions is outlined in a recently published Consortium study that demonstrates how to grade the condition of each major bone as good, fair or poor based on its external features (Figure 1).

Captive feeding trials were conducted at the Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre to determine the extent of erosion and to derive condition-specific digestion correction factors. In general, larger structures were found to be more digested than smaller ones.

Dr. Dom Tollit, Susan Heaslip and colleagues not only supplied grading and worked out appropriate correction factors for key sea lion prey species (walleye pollock and Atka mackerel), they also applied their methods to estimate the length of pollock consumed by Steller sea lions in Southeast Alaska. In total, they examined seven types of cranial (head) bones recovered from 531 sea lion scats collected between 1994 and 1999.

Accounting for the effect of digestion on bone length meant that previous fish length estimations had to be revised. Tollit and colleagues concluded that the new estimated lengths of fish eaten by Steller sea lions were 23% longer than previously thought (Figure 2). This, in turn, symbolized an even greater increase in the average weight of the consumed fish (an impressive 88% heavier!). Overall, accounting for the effects of digestion on the measured bones resulted in more than a doubling of the potential overlap in sizes of fish consumed by sea lions and those taken by a small commercial pollock fishery.

The size of the pollock consumed by sea lions in Southeast Alaska from 1994 to 1999 averaged 42.4 cm, but spanned a wide range of sizes (10-78cm, n = 909). The pollock consumed in Southeast Alaska during the 1990s appears to be larger than the pollock consumed in the 1970s and 1980s. This may mean that pollock were bigger and older on average in the 1990s. Adult pollock contributed 44% to the diet by numbers and 74% by mass during the 1990s study. A collaborative study with Tonya Zeppelin and researchers at the National Marine Mammal Laboratory developed new bone to fish size regression equations and applied the same methods to the bones of walleye pollock and Atka mackerel recovered from scats collected in the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea during the 1990s. They also found considerable overlap in the size of fish taken by Steller sea lions and commercial fisheries. Overlap in the sizes of fish eaten by sea lions and those caught by fisheries indicates the potential for competition to occur. However, this finding does not mean that the two are necessarily competing if there are sufficient fish to go around for both fisheries and sea lions. Assessing competition is an area of ongoing research.

12 July 2004

Further details can be found in:

Evaluating Quantitative Fatty Acid Signature Analysis (QFASA) using harbour seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi) in captive feeding studies. Nordstrom, C.A., L.J. Wilson, S.J. Iverson and D.J. Tollit. 2008. Marine Ecology Progress Series Vol 360 pp. 245–263 abstract Quantitative fatty acid (FA) signature analysis (QFASA) has recently been developed to estimate the species composition of predator diets by statistically comparing FA signatures of predator adipose tissue with that of their potential prey. Captive feeding trials were used to test the technique with newly-weaned harbour seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi, N = 21). Two groups of seals were fed monotypic diets of either Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) or surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus) for 42 days while a third group was fed smelt (21 days) followed by herring (21 days). Blubber biopsies were taken dorsally at day 0, 21 and 42. Specific calibration coefficients (CC) required by QFASA were developed from 4 juvenile harbour seals and in some cases differed by two-fold with previously reported phocid CC. QFASA diet estimates were evaluated using 2 CC sets, 15 FA subsets and a library of 3 – 11 potential prey species. Diet switches were best tracked using the harbour seal CC and a new FA subset. Overall prey misclassifications were apparent (mean = 12%, range = 4 – 25%) when modeled with 8 additional prey not fed, often consistent with overlapping prey FA signatures. Blubber FA turnover rates were not strictly linear and in the order of 1.5 – 3 months in newly-weaned animals. Following model parameter optimization, QFASA estimates reflected major diet trends in the feeding study, but were sensitive to the CC and FA subsets used as well as to prey species with similar FA signatures. Our results have important implications in the application of QFASA to study pinniped diets in more complex conditions.
Quantitative analysis of prey DNA in pinniped faeces: potential to estimate diet composition? Deagle, B.E. and D.J. Tollit. 2007. Conservation Genetics 8:743-747. abstract Recent studies have shown prey DNA can be consistently recovered from faeces and effectively used to provide dietary information. We investigate the possibility of using the relative amounts of DNA recovered from different prey in faeces to obtain quantitative diet composition data. Faecal samples were obtained from captive Steller seas lions (Eumetopias jubatus) being fed a fish diet consisting of 50% Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), 36% surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus) and 14% sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) by mass. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure the amount of mtDNA from the three fish species in: (i) a blended tissue mix representative of the sea lion diet and (ii) the sea lion faecal samples. The percent composition of fish mtDNA extracted from the undigested tissue samples corresponded reasonably well to the mass of fish in the mixture. In the faecal samples (n = 23) the absolute amount of fish mtDNA recovered varied 100-fold, but the percent composition of the three fish was relatively consistent (57.5 ± 9.3% for herring, 19.3 ± 6.6% for smelt and 23.2 ± 12.2% for salmon). Differences between the mtDNA proportions in the tissue samples compared to the faecal samples indicate there are prey-specific biases in DNA survival during digestion. These biases may be less than those commonly observed in the conventional analysis of prey hard remains. Further investigation of this approach is warranted.
Impact of diet index selection and the digestion of prey hard remains on determining the diet of the Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Tollit, D.J., S.G. Heaslip, R.L. Barrick and A.W. Trites. 2007. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:1-15. abstract Abstract: Nine prey species (n = 7,431) were fed to four captive female Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus (Schreber, 1776)) in eleven feeding trials over 75 days to investigate the effectiveness of different methods used to determine diet from prey hard remains. Trials aimed to replicate short (1-2 day) and long feeding bouts and consisted of single species and mixed daily diets. Overall, an average of 25.2% ± 22.2% (mean ± SD, range 0-83%) of otoliths were recovered, but recovery rates varied by species (ANOVA, P = 0.01) and were linearly related to otolith robustness (R2 = 0.88). Squid beaks were recovered at higher frequencies (mean = 96%) than the otoliths of all species. Enumerating both non-otolith skeletal structures and otoliths (together termed ?bones?) increased species recovery rates by twofold on average (P < 0.001), with increases up to 2.5 times for herring and 3-4 times for salmonids. Using bones reduced inter-specific differences (P = 0.08), but recovery ! varied among sea lions. Bones were distributed over more scats per meal (mean = 2.9 scats, range = 0-5) than otoliths (mean = 1.9 scats, range = 0-4). In three different 15-day mixed diet trials, biomass reconstruction (BR) indices performed better than frequency of occurrence indices in predicting diet fed. Applying our experimentally derived numerical correction factors (to account for species differences in complete prey digestion) further improved BR estimates, resulting in all twelve unweighted comparisons within 5% (for otoliths) and 12% (for bones) of the actual diet fed.
Using simulations to evaluate reconstructions of sea lion diet from scat. Joy, R., D.J. Tollit, J.L. Laake, and A.W. Trites. 2006. In A.W. Trites, S. Atkinson, D.P. DeMaster, L.W. Fritz, T.S. Gelatt, L.D. Rea and K. Wynne (eds), Sea Lions of the World. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. pp. 205-222. abstract Models used to describe pinniped diet can provide very different composition estimates. Occurrence indices as well as biomass reconstruction models (which use estimates of the number and sizes of prey consumed) are commonly used and increasingly utilize a variety of fish hard remains (bones) found in scats. However, the importance of any single fish can be overestimated if its bones are deposited in a succession of scats assumed to be from different fish. Similarly, the importance of a species will be underestimated relative to other species if the bones of one species are more fragile and are completely digested or if bones from different fish of the same species are contained in a single scat and assumed to be from a single fish. Species differences in the proportion of fish bones that survive digestion can be assessed from captive feeding studies where the number and species of prey consumed is known. Numerical correction factors can be calculated to take into account the levels of complete digestion. We performed computer simulations using data from captive feeding studies to investigate levels and sources of error in reconstructing simulated mixed species diets. Our simulations used different combinations of hard remains, were conducted both with and without the application of numerical correction factors, and compared four different diet indices (1. Modified frequency of occurrence, 2. Split sample frequency of occurrence, 3. Variable biomass reconstruction, 4. Fixed biomass reconstruction). Simulations indicated that levels of error were related to the MNI method of inferring fish numbers from prey remains, prey size, the number of identifiable prey structures used, and the robustness of the remains to digestive processes (recovery rate). The fewer fish fed, the higher the relative probability of counting the fish, particularly when a multiple element structure or all structure techniques are used. If recovery rates were assumed to be consistent across species, then large fish (particularly when fed in small amounts) were overestimated relative to smaller sized prey in all models, but particularly biomass reconstruction models and when using more than one paired structure. When recovery rates of a paired structure (otoliths) were varied across species (as observed in captive feeding studies) then biomass models tended to overestimate the species with high recovery rates. In contrast, frequency of occurrence models overestimated the contribution of smaller prey (particularly when fed in small amounts). Simulations also indicated correction factors can reduce levels of error in biomass reconstruction models, but cannot solve problems related to counting fish using MNI. Our work shows simulations can form a valuable component in assessing diet indices and the level (and direction) of associated errors in each.
Potential effects of short-term prey changes on sea lion physiology. Rosen, D.A., D.J. Tollit, A.J. Winship, and A.W. Trites. 2006. In A.W. Trites, S. Atkinson, D.P. DeMaster, L.W. Fritz, T.S. Gelatt, L.D. Rea and K. Wynne (eds), Sea Lions of the World. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. pp. 103-116. abstract hanges in the proximate composition of prey can result in a nutritional imbalance in individual animals, regardless of total energy intake. This mechanism has been hypothesized to have contributed to the decline of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Yet little is known about how otariids react physiologically to short-term changes in prey quality and availability. A series of studies with young captive Steller sea lions tested several potential links between prey quality and sea lion health. Body composition (fat to total mass ratio) of animals fed constant, maintenance-level, isocaloric diets of high- or low-lipid prey changed with season, but overall was not aff ected by prey composition. The sea lions appeared to prioritize maintaining core growth rates even when energy was limited, electing to deplete lipid reserves to fulfi ll energy defi cits, resulting in changes in relative body condition. In contrast, sea lions subject to short- term, sub-maintenance diets of high- or low-lipid prey utilized a greater portion of their lipid reserves when losing body mass on low lipid prey. Experiments with diff erent ad libitum feeding regimes indicated that sea lions are readily able to alter food intake levels to compensate for diff erences in prey energy content and, to a lesser degree, prey availability. However, the results also suggest that decreases in prey quality and/or foraging opportunities can readily combine to require food intake levels that are greater than the digestive capacity of the individual. This is particularly true for young animals that may already be living ?on the edge? energetically.
Estimating diet composition in sea lions: which technique to choose? Tollit, D.J., S.G. Heaslip, B.E. Deagle, S.J. Iverson, R. Joy, D.A.S. Rosen and A.W. Trites. 2006. In A.W. Trites, S. Atkinson, D.P. DeMaster, L.W. Fritz, T.S. Gelatt, L.D. Rea and K. Wynne (eds), Sea Lions of the World. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. pp. 293-307. abstract Accurate estimates of diets are vital to monitor impacts of sea lion populations on their ecosystems, their interactions with fisheries and to understand the role of food to animal nutrition and health. Approaches include using: (1) prey remnants in stomach contents, spews and scats, (2) prey DNA in scats (3) fatty acid signatures in blubber and (4) stable isotope ratios in predator's tissue. Each methodology has particular advantages and limitations, many of which can be assessed and improved through controlled captive feeding trials. Analysis of prey remnants from captive sea lion scats have shown significant variability in digestion between and within prey species, which coupled with preferential regurgitation and enumeration biases, can confound accurate diet quantification, but does not prevent spatial or temporal comparisons. Correction for partial digestion and use of additional structures besides otoliths can provide accurate prey size estimates. Prey DNA can be reliably isolated from soft remains in scats from captive sea lions and with further development this approach may allow quantification of diet. Genetic methods can be expensive and representative of only one to two days foraging (like prey remnant analysis), but may be less affected by differential digestion and can identify prey in scats that could not be identified through structural remnants. Validation of fatty acid signature analysis to quantify diet at longer temporal scales in sea lions is ongoing, but this new technique promises to be particularly useful to assess biases in traditional methods, identify the onset of weaning and to highlight what prey most contribute to lipid reserves. Stable isotope analysis of predator tissues gives only trophic level data, but can provide data on diet changes on many temporal scales. Remote video monitoring of foraging events and lavage/enema techniques can provide valuable diet information, but, like many newer techniques, animal capture is required. Ideally a suite of techniques should be used to study diet. While methods and correction factors developed for Steller sea lions can likely be applied to the other five sea lion species, they should be verified experimentally.
Molecular scatology as a tool to study diet: analysis of prey DNA in scats from captive Steller sea lions. Deagle, B.E., D.J. Tollit, S.N. Jarman, M.A. Hindell, A.W. Trites and N.J. Gales. 2005. Molecular Ecology 14:1831-1842. abstract The DNA of prey present in animal scats may provide a valuable source of information for dietary studies. We conducted a captive feeding trial to test whether prey DNA could be reliably detected in scat samples from Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Two sea lions were fed a diet of fish (five species) and squid (one species), and DNA was extracted from the soft component of collected scats. Most of the DNA obtained came from the predator, but prey DNA could be amplified using prey-specific primers. The four prey species fed in consistent daily proportions throughout the trial were detected in more than 90% of the scat DNA extractions. Squid and sockeye salmon, which were fed as a relatively small percentage of the daily diet, were detected as reliably as the more abundant diet items. Prey detection was erratic in scats collected when the daily diet was fed in two meals that differed in prey composition, suggesting that prey DNA is passed in meal specific puls! es. Prey items that were removed from the diet following one day of feeding were only detected in scats collected within 48 hours of ingestion. Proportions of fish DNA present in eight scat samples (evaluated through the screening of clone libraries) was roughly proportional to the mass of prey items consumed, raising the possibility that DNA quantification methods could provide semi-quantitative diet composition data. This study should be of broad interest to researchers studying diet since it highlights an approach that can accurately identify prey species and is not dependent on prey hard parts surviving digestion.
Sizes of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) consumed by the eastern stock of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Southeast Alaska from 1994-1999. Tollit, D.J., Heaslip, S.G. and Trites, A.W. 2004. Fishery Bulletin 102(3):522-532. abstract Lengths of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) consumed by Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) were estimated using allometric regressions applied to seven diagnostic cranial structures recovered from 531 scats collected in Southeast Alaska between 1994-1999. Selected structural measurements were corrected for loss of size due to erosion using experimentally derived condition-specific digestion correction factors. Correcting for digestion increased the estimated length of fish consumed by 23%, and the average mass of fish consumed by 88%. Mean corrected fork length (FL) of pollock consumed was 42.4 11.6 cm (range=10.0-78.1 cm, n=909). Adult pollock (>45.0 cm FL) occurred more frequently in scats collected from rookeries along the open ocean coastline of Southeast Alaska during June and July (74% adults, mean FL=48.4 cm) than they did in scats from haulouts located in inside waters between October and May (51% adults, mean FL=38.4 cm). Overall, the contribution of juvenile pollock (20 cm) to the sea lion diet was insignificant, while adults contributed 44% to the diet by number and 74% by mass. On average, larger pollock were eaten in summer at rookeries throughout Southeast Alaska than at rookeries in the Gulf of Alaska or the Bering Sea. Overall it appears that Steller sea lions are capable of consuming a wide size range of pollock, with the bulk of fish falling between 20-60 cm. The use of cranial hard parts other than otoliths and the application of digestion correction factors are fundamental to correctly estimating the sizes of prey consumed by sea lions and for determining their overlap with commercial fisheries.
A method to improve size estimates of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius) consumed by pinnipeds: digestion correction factors applied to bones and otoliths recovered in scats. Tollit, D.J., Heaslip, S.G., Zeppelin, T.K., Joy, R., Call, K.A. and Trites, A.W. 2004. Fishery Bulletin 102(3):498-508. abstract The lengths of otoliths and other skeletal structures recovered from the scats of pinnipeds, such as Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus), correlate with body size and can be used to estimate the length of prey consumed. Unfortunately, otoliths are often found in too few numbers or are too digested to usefully estimate prey size. Techniques are therefore required to account for the degree of digestion of alternative diagnostic bones prior to estimating prey size. We developed a method (using defined criteria and photo-reference material) to assign the degree of digestion for key cranial structures of two prey species (walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma and Atka mackerel, Pleurogrammus monopterygius). The method grades each structure into one of three condition categories; good, fair or poor. We also conducted captive feeding trials to determine the extent of erosion and derive condition-specific digestion correction factors to reconstruct the original sizes of the structures consumed. In general, larger structures were relatively more digested than smaller ones. Mean size reduction varied between different types of structures (3.3-26.3%), but was not influenced by the size of the prey consumed. Results from the observations and experiments were combined to reconstruct the size of prey consumed by sea lions and other pinnipeds. The proposed method has four steps: 1) measure the recovered structures and grade the extent of digestion using defined criteria and photo-reference collection; 2) exclude structures graded in poor condition; 3) multiply measurements of structures in good and fair condition by their appropriate digestion correction factors to derive their original size; and 4) calculate the size of prey from allometric regressions relating corrected structure measurements to body lengths. This technique can be readily applied to piscivore dietary studies that use fish hard remains.
Sizes of walleye pollock and Atka mackerel consumed by the Western stock of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska from 1998-2000. Zeppelin, T. K., Tollit, D.J., Call, K.A., Orchard, T. J. and Gudmundson, C. J. 2004. Fishery Bulletin 102(3):509-521. abstract Prey size selectivity by Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) is relevant for understanding the foraging ecology of this declining predator, but studies have been problematic due to the erosion or absence of prey skeletal structures and otoliths usually used to estimate fish length. We developed regression formulae to estimate fish length from seven diagnostic cranial structures of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius). For both species, all structure measurements were related with fork length of prey (r squared range: 0.78 - 0.99). Fork length of walleye pollock and Atka mackerel consumed by Steller sea lions was estimated by applying these regression models to cranial structures recovered from scats (feces) collected between 1998 and 2000 across the range of the Alaskan western stock of Steller sea lions. Experimentally derived digestion correction factors were applied to take into account loss of size due to digestion. Fork lengths (FL) of walleye pollock consumed by Steller sea lions ranged from 3.7 to 70.8 cm FL (mean = 1 39.3 cm, SD = 14.3 cm, n = 1 666) and Atka mackerel ranged from 15.3 to 49.6 cm FL (mean = 1 32.3 cm, SD = 5.9 cm, n = 1,685). Although sample sizes were limited, a greater proportion of juvenile (less than to 20 cm) walleye pollock were found in samples collected on summer (June - September) haul-out sites (64% juveniles, n = 1 11 scats) than on summer rookeries (9% juveniles, n = 1 132 scats) or winter (February - March) haul-out sites (3% juveniles, n = 1 69 scats). Annual changes in the size of Atka mackerel consumed by Steller sea lions corresponded to changes in the length distribution of Atka mackerel resulting from exceptionally strong year classes. Considerable overlap (> 51%) in the size composition of walleye pollock and Atka mackerel taken by Steller sea lions and the commercial trawl fishery was demonstrated.